I just came back from the southern part of Africa where I saw firsthand some of the wildlife issues and corruption and poaching and similar issues.

So you all are coming back to security as the next major hurdle, if we are going to be able to get the type of buy-in necessary.

So the representatives of the two factions cannot really speak for the population?

It seems to me, from what you are saying, that the threat of ISIL or extremists is not looked upon as a unifying factor to develop a unified government.

Too many times, we have been putting that down as a second priority rather than a high priority.

There are two issues I at least want to put on the table.

In the meantime, there are people hurting. The humanitarian needs are dramatic.

I understand the security issues have to be resolved. But is that a leverage factor for the United States?

What would it take for the U.S. to return its mission to Tripoli? Would that be pressure that could be used to bear to bring stakeholders together?

So what is the next step?

Only a negotiated political settlement can end the chaos, violence, and human suffering, and set the country on a path of inclusiveness and stability.

Those obligations are only good if they are enforced, and the United States can do more to be vigilant and enforce the agreements we have reached.

Under the loophole, economics trumped human rights, and Senator Brown and I said that was absolutely, 100 percent wrong.

If we are going to have this discussion, we should have it now, and it should be in the broad daylight.

I would like to ask unanimous consent to insert into the record the press release put out by Ford Motor Company earlier this year announcing their withdrawal from the Japanese market.

These documents illustrate, I think, widespread issues with FTA implementation and enforcement and the need to get them right under TPP.

My number one goal, when it comes to the cutthroat global economy, is to fight for American workers.

We need to get enforcement.