As is sometimes said, the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Isn't that the best technique? If you're trying to see to it that noncitizens vote and turn the margin in close races and you consider that to be essential to your political success, then what are you going to do?

I think they'd be proud of the right to vote. I think they would be absolutely committed to the idea that folks who haven't gone through the same process that they've done and accomplished the same outcome should not be voting.

Isn't that significant, the fact that a Majority of the Committee charged by the Congress to inquire into the grounds for impeaching the President of the United States has issued has marked up a contempt resolution?

It makes no sense that the Biden administration refuses to take common-sense steps to secure our border in the face of such obvious threats to our homeland.

I think the American people are wise to this.

The problems just keep coming.

What is the design there? The biggest thing that concerns me is that as of now, if we had another crisis emerge, it almost looks like the same events would be repeated.

So, said shorter, nothing?

How can Congress and the American people have confidence that the outcome of close elections will not turn on the votes of noncitizens who have registered and voted unlawfully?

I think Congress really needs to look at this problem of preemption as a significant one that erodes States' rights.