Dan Bishop

It is the Biden Administration that is failing to abide by Congress' laws.

The people of Texas have a right to defend themselves just as I have a right to defend my home and my family if it is under attack.

331 known or suspected terrorists have been caught crossing the Southern border.

We have hundreds of examples like that in Texas, of criminal activity of people being released by this administration.

Secretary Mayorkas himself admitted some 85 percent of migrants encountered at the border are being released immediately.

We are experiencing invasion at the Southern border.

You believe he does that on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party?

Was Nike acting on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party in trying to weaken that legislation as it was being considered by Congress?

This is an economic, strategic, and moral issue, and the UFLPA marked a significant step toward countering China's predatory and exploitative practices.

The Government cannot simply sidestep the Constitution by outsourcing censorship under the guise of protecting critical infrastructure.

Congress cannot wait or hope for a court decision to stop DHS and CISA's overreach.

CISA probably violated the First Amendment through its censorship activities.

The Government's power to censor speech... must be strictly limited to content that is not Constitutionally-protected.

Congress has a duty to rein in out of control agencies and protect the rights of the American people.

What is stopping DHS from overreaching its jurisdiction beyond elections to censor more Americans, to 'protect' whatever Government-deployed orthodox notions it deems critical infrastructure?

The impact of this censorship effort was massive, 859 million tweets collected for 'misinformation analysis', 22 million tweets and retweets categorized as misinformation subject to censorship.

After CISA's hands were caught in the censorship cookie jar some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have come to the defense of its censorship-laundering enterprise, its censorship by proxy.

As Americans, we are committed to the idea that freedom of speech and open debate are essential features of a free society.

It does seem to me that while we can help treat symptoms by doing more information sharing and task force and resource provision, if we've caused a lot of the problem by not sufficiently backing law enforcement.

If the allegations made by the plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack on free speech in United States history.

You have supervised elective policies that have allowed this level of flow into the United States. Isn't that true?

I would be working hard to cover my posterior--

You have all given it, sucker, you have all permitted it to happen and said nothing publicly about what you now acknowledge to be a material risk.

Whatever you think about the former President, I urge you to go to USA Today about that continued claim that he said that antisemites, that neo-Nazis were fine people on both sides. It is a lie.

For the better part of the past decade, the Chinese Communist Party has waged a ruthless and inhumane campaign of repression and genocide against the Uyghur minority population.