The Government's power to censor speech... must be strictly limited to content that is not Constitutionally-protected.
Dan Bishop
The Public Record
Dan Bishop is an American politician and attorney currently serving as the U.S. Representative for North Carolina's 9th congressional district, a position he has held since September 10, 2019. A member of the Republican Party, Bishop has focused on issues such as immigration, healthcare, and economic development during his time in office. He previously served in the North Carolina General Assembly, where he was known for his conservative stance on various legislative matters.
Congress has a duty to rein in out of control agencies and protect the rights of the American people.
What is stopping DHS from overreaching its jurisdiction beyond elections to censor more Americans, to 'protect' whatever Government-deployed orthodox notions it deems critical infrastructure?
Congress cannot wait or hope for a court decision to stop DHS and CISA's overreach.
As Americans, we are committed to the idea that freedom of speech and open debate are essential features of a free society.
The impact of this censorship effort was massive, 859 million tweets collected for 'misinformation analysis', 22 million tweets and retweets categorized as misinformation subject to censorship.
The Government cannot simply sidestep the Constitution by outsourcing censorship under the guise of protecting critical infrastructure.
After CISA's hands were caught in the censorship cookie jar some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have come to the defense of its censorship-laundering enterprise, its censorship by proxy.
CISA probably violated the First Amendment through its censorship activities.
It does seem to me that while we can help treat symptoms by doing more information sharing and task force and resource provision, if we've caused a lot of the problem by not sufficiently backing law enforcement.
If the allegations made by the plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack on free speech in United States history.
You have all given it, sucker, you have all permitted it to happen and said nothing publicly about what you now acknowledge to be a material risk.
You have supervised elective policies that have allowed this level of flow into the United States. Isn't that true?
Whatever you think about the former President, I urge you to go to USA Today about that continued claim that he said that antisemites, that neo-Nazis were fine people on both sides. It is a lie.
Enforcing the UFLPA carries with it not only U.S. economic and competitive interests, but also a moral issue to prevent forced labor.
I think as a matter of enforcing trade law for the American people, the notion that American producers should be required to compete against slave labor from a denier of human rights abroad is the easiest thing for American consumers and…
For the better part of the last decade, the Chinese Communist Party has waged a ruthless and inhuman campaign of repression and genocide against the Uyghur minority population.
For the better part of the past decade, the Chinese Communist Party has waged a ruthless and inhumane campaign of repression and genocide against the Uyghur minority population.
I think many Americans... believe that the $8 trillion that we spent in Afghanistan and Iraq didn't work out well.
As Governor Beasley said, either you feed these people or you are going to continue to throw gasoline on top of a fire that will eventually overwhelm us.
The problem is we have gone from about 1,400 children to--I can't do the number--to 83,000 a year that have gone missing.
I have some concern about militarizing this dispute and having the United States military take on the Mexican cartels.
The people who have erased our borders as a means of improving their voter population might--already have gotten more than they bargained for.





