But intentional sabotage of the rule of law is something entirely different. It is an affront to the separation of powers.
Dan Bishop: “But intentional sabotage of the rule of law is something entirely different. It is an affront to the separation of…”
Editor's note · Context
Bishop discusses the implications of intentional sabotage of the law versus negligence.
Share
More from Dan Bishop
This is not the first time that restricting speech has been pursued in the interests of national security. In fact, in 5 days' time, next Monday, I will go to the Supreme Court for the first time where I will attend an oral argument in the…
As the comments to the gentlewoman from Washington developed, it became clear. She said at first I mischaracterized what occurred in the Judiciary Committee, and then it became clear that I didn't mischaracterize anything. What they…
A lot of that is the product of a destabilized world that results from the absence of strong leadership in the White House of the United States and grievous errors in judgment across the globe.





