Maybe you ought to confer with Apple, since Apple seems to be pretty good on privacy, in terms of being able to get into the iPhone of a terrorist.

No more cover-ups, no more head-in-the-sand approaches to safety. If we are going to avoid the tragedies, we've got to be johnny-on-the-spot.

There are going to be many lives that could be saved by preventing preventable accidents.

There are technologies available, which have already been demonstrated to the Chairman and me, that take over that drone.

If the drone gets sucked into the jet engine, that's a catastrophic failure.

So you think that there will be the capability of protecting against cyber threats, even without it being extremely expensive.

So what you're saying is that technology will allow you to protect people's privacy, even in an autonomous vehicle with all the gadgets in it?

It's interesting that you mention drones, because tomorrow, in this committee, we're going to mark up the FAA bill.

I think it is really about the democratic legitimacy, about the consent of the government.

We have not had the courage of our conviction.

they do have a right to seek independence, and then it has to be managed in a way that it doesn't destabilize.

So sometimes we can do better than simply saying whatever the majority decides goes.

The Czechs and the Slovaks managed to pull this off very quickly.

I do believe that is their right.

I am concerned, however, about how the geographic rating areas for each State can skew the cost of health care.

I know in my home State of Colorado, 16.5 percent of people lacked health care insurance before the Affordable Care Act, and last year, the number fell to 6.7 percent, a historic low.

I applaud the work of the Department of Health and Human Services for working to implement the Affordable Care Act.

It shocks me every single time we have one of these hearings and I don't hear a single Democrat go after the President for his executive overreach.