Congressman Rohrabacher's H.R. 5724, Restoring Community Oversight of Sober Living Homes Act of 2018 is the second bill in two years attempting to clarify local control to come to the Judiciary Committee.
Dana Rohrabacher
The Public Record
Dana Rohrabacher is a former U.S. Representative for California's 48th congressional district, serving from 1989 to 2019. A member of the Republican Party, he is known for his libertarian views and strong support for the tech industry. During his time in Congress, Rohrabacher was an advocate for various issues, including technology innovation and foreign policy matters, particularly regarding Taiwan and its democratic governance. He often emphasized the importance of individual liberties and limited government intervention.
★ Featured Quote
September 27, 2018
Ignoring the issue results in disastrous effects on long-term residential neighborhoods, and fuels an increase of abuse in--of the protected class.
— Dana Rohrabacher
Yes, thank you much, Chairman King, Ranking Member Cohen, and other members of the subcommittee.
Meantime and meanwhile, crooked owners and operators laugh all the way to the bank.
Under normal circumstances this problem would be addressed by local government.
The way I handle this as chairman I usually let people finish their train of thought.
I remember, like, one of the things when I first got here was the Clinton administration's insistence on spending what was the equivalent of $50 million providing fuel for North Korea, and it had just the opposite impact.
It made it less likely, and this President, with all of his abrasiveness and all of the way that he gets people angry at him, calling the guy 'Rocket Man' and things like that, we have made tremendous strides forward at least getting the…
I mean, Ukraine, we've spent $1 billion in Ukraine, I guess, in the last couple years and everybody acknowledges the level of corruption there is just dramatic.
Maybe the people of these countries--for example, Hungary or elsewhere, when they see us getting involved with trying to push various policies and issues with the NGOs, et cetera, in their country, maybe they see it as the same kind of…
Can we still afford to do that and why should we do that if they already have a democratically elected government?
We need to now show in the age that we are in exactly how this is going to have an impact--positive impact on the United States because we are borrowing that money from our grandchildren.
Isn't it somewhat presumptuous of us to go in and then to actually take more of that $833 billion that we are spending in deficit to go in to try to help them--push them in certain directions, even though they already have a democratically…
If Central Asia stays stable from the expansion of radical Islam the whole world will be better off, especially the Western world will be better off.
That type of deficit spending has to be dealt with in some way and one way will be to increase the productivity of our economy.
Our Government and, hence, the American people are over $1 trillion--that's $21 trillion--in debt.
Well, thank you, Mr. Meeks. I have a few questions of my own. But let me note that we are spending $833 billion more this year than we are taking in.
For decades it's been the policy of the United States to see the countries of Europe and Eurasia increase their liberty.
Shame on them. Shame on them, and I would hope that, Mr. Chairman, that they're listening right now.
Let us declare that the Government of Burma is an outlaw among nations because this is not inconsistent with their behavior over the last 30 years and the military has--and we declared that the military is guilty of crimes against humanity.
It's just a vicious, one of the most iron-fisted dictatorships in the world.





