Our goal is simply to speed up the Latin American agreements to catch up with the Korean agreement!

It is simply not a Republican view.

I think we all agree that it is good for our country, it is good for Korea, has all types of economic, political, national security reasons why we should support this agreement.

South Korea is a dynamic market and key ally in the Asia-Pacific region.

I have been impressed with the number of jobs that are going to be made available under the Colombian free trade agreement.

Implementation of agreements by other countries, and continued inaction on our agreement, will result in further missed opportunities to create American jobs.

Aerospace is a great example; 92 percent of our aerospace exports will go duty free, upon implementation of the agreement.

We either move forward or we fall backward; the choice is ours. Staying still is just not an option.

I do not want to beat a dead horse, but no one works more closely with the Koreans than I do.

The language in the Colombian agreement, Panama agreement, and the Korean agreement, aren't they exactly the same, as it relates to the environment?

Well, I appreciate your recognition of that falsehood on the loss of jobs.

I totally agree with the gentleman in his observation that there really needs to be a concerted effort regarding education about the number of jobs that are created through these agreements.

We want to sell American. I mean that is the goal, right? Sell American across the world.

There is a bright light shining on us right now, as to our success, right?

This is all about selling American products. And so, we should all in America be about selling American.

I want to mention how much of an honor and a pleasure it has been to work with the export initiative group.

So, I think everyone is recognizing the value there, the possible loss of jobs if we do not pass these agreements.

It is always easy to talk about the benefits or the shortcomings of trade in the generic.