We are very confident that we can continue to provide hospitality to folks … while maintaining the same standard of security for passengers and our homeland.

That doesn’t mean there won’t be times where someone will have to remove their shoes.

If Harvard won’t defend the interests of its students, then we will.

We tried to do things the easy way with Harvard. Now, through their refusal to cooperate, we have to do things the hard way.

Harvard, like other universities, has allowed foreign students to abuse their visa privileges and advocate for violence and terrorism on campus.

The long-standing policy requiring most passengers to remove their shoes at TSA checkpoints is no longer in effect.

No one on Social Security would see any change to benefits as a result of the plan.

The loss of life is just shocking.

We stand in solidarity with the people of Texas, and we are committed to offering any and all support requested during this critical time.

Ruidoso endured devastating wildfires and flooding last summer, and now catastrophic flooding is hitting this resilient community again. This crisis demands immediate action.

New Mexico is mobilizing every resource we have, but Ruidoso needs federal support to recover from this disaster. We’ve watched Texas receive the federal resources they desperately needed, and Ruidoso deserves that same urgent response.

My family was there, along with friends, and by the grace of God, my family was safe.

Our hearts go out to the families and communities in Texas who have been devastated by these historic floods.

by blocking the rule, the legislative committee is taking over powers that the state constitution assigns to the governor and exercising an unconstitutional 'legislative veto.'

Wisconsinites want to protect our constitutional checks and balances. Today’s Wisconsin Supreme Court decision ensures that no small group of lawmakers has the sole power to stymie the work of state government and go unchecked.

It’s pretty simple—a handful of Republican lawmakers should not be able to single-handedly and indefinitely obstruct state agencies from doing the people’s work.

Our proposal is also consistent with virtually every other pension plan — state and private — currently operating in our country, and it matches the strategy most nations use to fund their retirement programs.

The Treasury would temporarily shoulder the burden of providing benefits to Social Security beneficiaries — but when the new fund’s 75 years are up, it would pay the Treasury back and supplement payroll taxes to help fill the future gap.