
I am looking at your testimony in describing the three parallel efforts to mitigate the impending shortfall.
On the record
Quotes from current and former United States senators.
Current senators
















WI-D
WY-R
CO-D
TN-R
CT-D
MO-R
NJ-D
AR-R
IN-R
AL-R
OH-D
NC-R
NC-R
WA-D
WV-R
MD-D
DE-D
PA-D
LA-R
ME-R
DE-D
TX-R
NV-D
AR-R
ND-R
ID-R
TX-R
MT-R
IL-D
IL-D
IA-R
PA-D
NE-R
NY-D
SC-R
IA-R
TN-R
NH-D
MO-R
NM-D
CO-D
HI-D
ND-R
MS-R
WI-R
VA-D
AZ-D
LA-R
ME-I
MN-D
OK-R
UT-R
NM-D
WY-R
WV-D
MA-D
KS-R
KY-R
OR-D
KS-R
OK-R
AK-R
CT-D
WA-D
GA-D
CA-D
KY-R
MI-D
OH-R
RI-D
ID-R
UT-R
NV-D
SD-R
FL-R

VT-I
NE-R
HI-D
MO-R
NY-D
FL-R
SC-R
NH-D
AZ-I
MN-D
MI-D
AK-R
MT-D
SD-R
NC-R
FL-R
AL-R
OH-R
MD-D
VA-D
GA-D
MA-D
RI-D
MS-R
OR-D
IN-RFormer senators

I am looking at your testimony in describing the three parallel efforts to mitigate the impending shortfall.

So it is absolutely vital that we continue the present pace of building at two submarines a year as outlined by the program submitted by the Department of the Navy.

$500 million as an additional cost is a fairly significant increment of the total cost. Is it not?

I appreciate your statement that, to make up for the loss of the strike capacity of the retiring SSGNs, the Navy requested funding of approximately $121 million in fiscal year 2014 to continue the design for the VPM that can launch more…

the best thing that we can do is to put aside politics and take a hard look at the facts of what went wrong

If I can interrupt you for a second, I went to that elementary school. I think they did it in 4 days.

I frankly find it inconceivable that you could really calculate where you are going to spend $60 billion.

I guess my problem is it is a huge guess. How do you know you are going to spend $11 billion?