I look forward to reading it. I have not. I have read remarks pro and con.

I was very pleased that you and every one of your colleagues on the Commission assured me at our last oversight hearing that you will not let this plant start up unless you are absolutely convinced it is safe to operate.

We will all work together because this Committee has to vote this up or down.

31 of our nuclear plants are identical to the one that had problems in Fukushima.

Well, maybe there are some people here would like to experiment on my people. But I am not going to let it happen.

I want all of the investigations to be completed before the plant is restarted.

An investigation is an investigation. If it has subpart a, b, c and d, they have to be completed.

This thing is really disturbing.

I thank my Ranking Member for his attention to an issue that I know commands his passion.

I think very, very highly of him, and I have two questions that I will ask of you.

I think as a matter of law any witness who is testifying before Congress is deemed to be sworn.

I think we expect that judges must respect the role of Congress as representatives of the American people.

I have had a hearing that I think has highlighted my concern that there are violations of fairly simple laws, like 18 U.S. Code 1001, the false statements law.

We expect judges to limit themselves to the issues that the court must decide.

Confirming an outstanding nominee like Mr. West to that position as quickly as possible will help ensure the smooth running of the Department.

I have a great deal of not only respect for Ranking Member Grassley, but also a great deal of gratitude to him.

We have a distinctly American system of Government, one with separated powers between judicial, executive, and legislative branches.

We expect judges not to prejudge any case but to listen to every party fairly that comes before them.