I do, sir.

I think you had some really good questions coming from my colleagues on the Democratic side.

If the Iranians are given the right to enrich, would you claim an equal right? They all told me yes.

I want every Member of the Senate to understand that we are being told by our military leaders and our Intelligence Community that there is a threat to the Homeland building.

I think that conditions would change very rapidly in the region.

Any agreement with the Iranians that allows them to enrich uranium is probably going to lead to proliferation.

For how long?

I hope it does not happen, but I just want Russia to know that we are not going to sit on the sidelines forever here.

Count me in on reforming the military. Count me out when it comes to gutting the military.

The problem that we are discussing was created by Congress and the White House.

I worry about more to come in the last hours of the Karzai administration.

I just want the point to be that the analysis of numbers is budget-driven, not threats.

Would you support providing arms to Ukraine, if they asked NATO?

It would be hard to describe this as a time of peace.

I want to be generous to our military men and women.

If somehow, some way, the world sanctions an Iranian enrichment program, you have set the stage for the whole Middle East to becoming an enrichment zone, and God help us all, under that scenario.

Do you agree with me that deterrence is one aspect of a strong, capable nuclear program to deter rational nation-states from engaging the United States?

You're telling us Congress hasn't given you and your colleagues the tool to deal with this threat. Is that fair to say?