
I think he is absolutely right with regard to the war would continue whether or not we are there or not.
On the record
Quotes from current and former United States senators.
Current senators
















WI-D
WY-R
CO-D
TN-R
CT-D
MO-R
NJ-D
AR-R
IN-R
AL-R
OH-D
NC-R
NC-R
WA-D
WV-R
MD-D
DE-D
PA-D
LA-R
ME-R
DE-D
TX-R
NV-D
AR-R
ND-R
ID-R
TX-R
MT-R
IL-D
IL-D
IA-R
PA-D
NE-R
NY-D
SC-R
IA-R
TN-R
NH-D
MO-R
NM-D
CO-D
HI-D
ND-R
MS-R
WI-R
VA-D
AZ-D
LA-R
ME-I
MN-D
OK-R
UT-R
NM-D
WY-R
WV-D
MA-D
KS-R
KY-R
OR-D
KS-R
OK-R
AK-R
CT-D
WA-D
GA-D
CA-D
KY-R
MI-D
OH-R
RI-D
ID-R
UT-R
NV-D
SD-R
FL-R

VT-I
NE-R
HI-D
MO-R
NY-D
FL-R
SC-R
NH-D
AZ-I
MN-D
MI-D
AK-R
MT-D
SD-R
NC-R
FL-R
AL-R
OH-R
MD-D
VA-D
GA-D
MA-D
RI-D
MS-R
OR-D
IN-RFormer senators

I think he is absolutely right with regard to the war would continue whether or not we are there or not.

Anyone, if you just listen today to all of these people that are running for President of the United States, when they talk about the military and they talk about the Department of Defense, they talk about waste, fraud, and abuse.

In such circumstances, it makes sense to adjust the regulations.

Going to a zero option next year would be playing roulette with Afghanistan's future.

A 980,000 Total Army will be capable of executing the defense strategy outlined in the 2014 QDR at a 'significant' level of risk.

General Dunford has forecasted that next decade will be characterized by small-scale crises in and around coastal areas.

You know, the tragedy in Chattanooga was one that we're all--you already expressed your sentiments about that, and we all share your sentiments.

How do lower readiness levels and a smaller force impact our ability to deter aggression?

Should the United States be postured to fight two Major Contingency Operations simultaneously?

Being postured to fight one Major Contingency Operation reduces the military's deterrent effect.

General Dunford, does our military have the capability and credibility to deter aggression around the globe?

The priority for U.S. military assistance to Taiwan is to provide defensive systems and capabilities in order for Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capacity.

General Dunford, do you believe our potential adversaries have that perception?

We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo on either side of the Strait, and we support peaceful resolution of cross-Strait differences in a manner acceptable on both sides.

I authored the amendment that raised it from 60 to 65. Maybe we should have put it at 70.

Readiness is the core requirement, which underpins deterrence of rational opponents.

Is this the correct size for our Army given threats around the world and demands for ground forces everywhere?

This personnel drawdown supports the President's Fiscal Year 2016 Budget and is part of the Army's effort to rebalance endstrength, readiness, and modernization efforts.