I think one of the general themes here that you're seeing is that people are applauding the success.

The President supposedly is going to put forward a bill to do that. It will go nowhere in this Congress.

I think there's a lot of different conditions that go into the recommendations that I provide.

I think this goes to the leveling with the American people on what we're actually doing.

I think you are doing exactly what the EPA reprimanded you from doing in its recent Supreme Court case where you are taking significant power under the Clean Air Act that is dramatically expanding your powers over the U.S. economy without…

I certainly don't think that relatively flimsy agreements between the President and China authorize the EPA to do anything that Congress has not authorized.

I have a hard time--you know, with the dependency they have on the United States and our presence there...

Can we prevent that in Afghanistan?

The bottom line is, do you think that Afghanistan is more stable and better prepared to take care of itself with our help or without our help?

We hear an awful lot about what's going on, what caused--in Iraq, we fell backwards.

I think it's important to have condition-based withdrawal dates or transition dates based on success.

The last time I looked at the Constitution, that wasn't where the EPA derives its authority.

A lot of these require actions by Congress under the Constitution.

Afghanistan is a troubling place. And I hear a lot from the constituents, back in West Virginia.

It would be hard to explain. Basically that would be the same glide path we had if not maybe a little difference than Iraq, and we saw the results of Iraq.

Do they have any economy at all? Other than the war effort, is their economy sucking off the U.S. taxpayers?

This President needs to understand he needs to be decisive and take different action or he is putting American interests at risk.

If there's anybody that can turn Afghanistan around and their economy around, it's going to be President Ghani.