My views really haven't changed. What's really changed is the party.

At the stroke of midnight, a huge bipartisan bill to lower housing costs became law without the President's signature. Why did President Trump sit on the landmark housing bill for more than 2 weeks? Maybe because there was nothing in it…

Trump refused to sign it, but he couldn’t stop it. This law is groundbreaking. It will build more housing, bring down costs, and for the first time, stop private equity from buying up homes.

Donald Trump and his reckless policies have made gas, groceries, and housing much more expensive.

My goal in six months is that we’re not the lead story every single day.

ICE will continue to arrest and remove these public safety threats from our communities.

This compromise bill is a step in the right direction, helping to expand homeownership opportunities and address the national housing affordability crisis nationwide.

We adamantly disagree with this internal assessment, and we urge your agency to immediately revert fentanyl protocols to the 2017 standard of seize or otherwise prevent the distribution of fentanyl as soon as practicable.

For too long, the conversation about artificial intelligence has been about what’s next — the next breakthrough, the next headline, the next promise of the future. But the American people need more than future promises; they need answers…

The risks are the lived reality of AI for millions of Americans — and they deserve policymakers who are paying attention to their lives, not Big Tech’s bottom line.

“I thank our witness for joining us today, and I look forward to your testimony,”

I will continue pushing to address the housing crisis facing California and the entire nation through comprehensive legislation like my Housing for All Act.

“Quantum technologies promise to dramatically transform every industry and sector of our economy and revolutionize our technological capabilities.

I’m grateful to see federal resources delivering real results for the communities that need them most.

If prosecuting cases involving the risk of injuries or death to premature infants are not a priority enforcement matter, I have questions about what priorities the DOJ considers worthy of pursuing.

Under your management, DOJ does not consider a case involving deadly risks to medically sensitive infants, after a recommendation of a felony charge, to be worthy of criminal prosecution.

For such serious allegations, a DOJ dedicated to enforcing the law — regardless of the political affiliation of its Attorney General — would likely insist on criminal charges and a civil penalty, not simply a settlement that is a cost of…

This federal funding will make critical upgrades at California’s airports. These major investments will create more jobs in communities across the Golden State.