I will be tenacious until we actually get your compliance.

If your testimony is--because on the January 29 meeting that he has talked about where you actually came in and talked about subpoena compliance with staff, actually you provided a few rolling document productions.

If you are having discussions with them, how could that not be helping them develop the rule?

So why did you do that? I mean, I heard that in your original testimony.

So we had five Uzis that were missing for 10 years. We found them, and we waited 3 years to have the IG come in and look at it? Do you not see a problem with that?

I just want to caution you: don't--listen, I know all my sheriffs by first name. I know my chiefs by first name. I love law enforcement.

the time is now to fix it.

The administration's disregard for the congressional intent is intolerable, especially when we look at the action being done to appease a country like Iran.

Are we expecting another report? Because, as you and I agree, that is not complete.

It sounds like we have created a jobs program for Iran that we are concerned about their business activity at the expense of the national security of all freedom-loving Americans.

But there hasn't still been one. Let's be clear about that. We have had a partial report.

It is time you get it back to this committee, and we are going to continue to bring you back until we get a report, okay?