Political Quotes

Mike Crapo

The Public Record

Mike Dean Crapo is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from Idaho, a position he has held since 1999. A member of the Republican Party, Crapo has focused on various issues including tax policy, healthcare, and trade. He has been an advocate for making the 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent and has expressed support for targeted tariffs to protect American interests.

Quotes by year · 1994–20261,228 total · peak 2023 (251)
1994: 1 quote1995: 12 quotes1997: 1 quote1999: 5 quotes2000: 3 quotes2001: 3 quotes2003: 14 quotes2004: 4 quotes2005: 3 quotes2008: 1 quote2009: 75 quotes2010: 26 quotes2011: 72 quotes2012: 34 quotes2013: 103 quotes2014: 44 quotes2015: 69 quotes2016: 39 quotes2017: 89 quotes2018: 81 quotes2021: 222 quotes2022: 26 quotes2023: 251 quotes2025: 17 quotes2026: 33 quotes
Mar 17, 2003

Many people will remember that a few short years ago we were talking about major surpluses across the board and for as far as we could see into the future. In fact, I have in front of me a projection that was based back in January of 2001…

govinfo.gov
Feb 26, 2003

Miguel Estrada believes his papers will show support for him. But the principle here is the principle--

govinfo.gov
Feb 26, 2003

If I understand correctly, you are reading that the internal work documents of a career attorney of the Solicitor General's Office in making recommendations on how to handle cases would not be something this Senate should try to…

govinfo.gov
Dec 12, 2001

The response to that is the CRP works very well. It is doing a lot of good for wildlife in the United States. It is not specifically focused on the acquisition of water rights. The expansion of the CRP, which we are trying to accomplish in…

govinfo.gov
Dec 12, 2001

The Senator talked about the fact this is based on a willing relationship. But if I understand the amendment correctly, it is willing only in the sense that any landowner who wanted to participate in the new CRP acreage that is authorized…

govinfo.gov
Oct 25, 2001

I join Senator Craig in acknowledging Chairman Kohl's and Senator Cochran's hard work on this bill and in expressing my deep concerns for the farmers of southern Idaho. Senator Craig has provided a good background on the issue and the…

govinfo.gov
Oct 12, 2000

Multiple uses of public lands necessarily require the balancing of occasionally competing interests and objectives. The most appropriate parties to make decisions regarding wildlife habitat development and other uses and activities are…

govinfo.gov
Oct 12, 2000

Concerns have been raised that Pittman-Robertson lands should not be used for field trials. As the Senator from New Hampshire knows, the sportsmen who pay this excise tax have varied interests-- they are hunters, field trialers, and…

govinfo.gov
Sep 28, 2000

Report language in the FY2001 Senate Energy and Water Development bill supports DOE's efforts to use the experience and expertise of scientists of the former Soviet Union to address waste management and environmental remediation challenges…

govinfo.gov
Jun 28, 1999

More can be accomplished when parties work together to solve problems than through conflict.

congress.gov
Jun 28, 1999

Objective science and reasonable solutions would then be available for policy makers, agency executives, and advocate groups involved in critical natural resource issues.

congress.gov
Jun 28, 1999

Mr. Smith expects that instead of massive engineering solutions to remove the waste, natural processes that cause less environmental disturbance will be more commonly utilized.

congress.gov
Jun 28, 1999

I rise to bring to the attention of my colleagues a significant achievement in the field of environmental science.

congress.gov
Feb 23, 1999

No, I have not discussed removing the administrative cap with those who placed it, but I would be very willing, as I said before, to do so and to work toward that end because I agree that that is one more inequity that should be removed. I…

govinfo.gov
Jul 15, 1997

Yes, Mr. Chairman, that is a correct interpretation, with this explanation. If the Member bringing the amendment wants the funding to be utilized in another program, he can easily do so in the amendment. But most of the time when we debate…

govinfo.gov
Mar 3, 1995

I appreciate that; and so to emphasize again this is talking about when a person is seeking to use their own private property in a way that could cause damage to someone else's property, and somehow final agency action becomes involved…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

I would ask the gentleman one other question. On section 5, as we have talked earlier today, subsection 2 says, ``No compensation is made under this act with regard to damage to specific property, other than the property whose use is…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

In that context, then, the agency would not be able to continuously, budget cycle after budget cycle, dodge the obligation of payment here by simply programming funds around or saying that the funds were insufficient?

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

Just to follow up on that, Mr. Chairman, if an agency failed to pay a claim and then stated their reason was they did not have money in their claim fund or whatever part of their budget was allocated to payment of claims, as I read the…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

That is the question. Does that change also that portion of the act which simply is talking about the specific property impacted to say we are talking about all of the property owned by the property owner?

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

As I read it, the amendment says neither the sufficiency nor any other aspect of a private property impact analysis under this section is subject to judicial review.

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

I would just ask one question. I thought the gentlewoman said at the beginning of her debate that under this amendment, there would be a right for judicial review or the opportunity to go to court.

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

We have to understand, in this debate, the difference between protections under the U.S. Constitution and what this statute seeks to do. The Supreme Court has made it clear that the constitutional protections relate to what amounts to a…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

The amendment allows compensation only if an agency does not conduct a property impact analysis. If the agency does conduct that analysis, they do not have to compensate, regardless what the impact analysis said.

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1995

If the agency is successfully able to identify a way to impact the property without totally taking it, there is no compensation as long as they analyze it and say so.

govinfo.gov

Politicians like Mike Crapo