The Senator talked about the fact this is based on a willing relationship. But if I understand the amendment correctly, it is willing only in the sense that any landowner who wanted to participate in the new CRP acreage that is authorized under the farm bill would be required to either temporarily or permanently yield his or her water rights or could simply choose not to participate in the new acreage. The question is, Is there any way for a landowner to participate in the acreage program for the CRP that is being expanded here without being required by contract to yield up their water rights?
Mike Crapo: “The Senator talked about the fact this is based on a willing relationship. But if I understand the amendment correctly…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and water rights.
Share
More from Mike Crapo
Allegations of misuse and abuse of the independent dispute resolution process are deeply concerning and risk undermining patient protections Congress intended with enactment of the No Surprises Act.
“Secretary Burgum’s announcement moves us one step closer to allowing Idaho wildlife professionals to manage a recovered grizzly population in a way that protects both the species and Idaho communities.”
This product reflects years of bipartisan efforts to translate stories of casework frustrations into tangible fixes designed to make the IRS work more efficiently for the American people.
This investment reinforces our nation’s technological leadership while reducing reliance on foreign adversaries for critical energy capabilities.





