Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 2, 1995
We have to understand, in this debate, the difference between protections under the U.S. Constitution and what this statute seeks to do. The Supreme Court has made it clear that the constitutional protections relate to what amounts to a full taking of the property. And when the Federal agencies do not fully take your property but simply regulate what you can do with your property to a lesser extent than actually taking it from you, the constitutional provisions under the Supreme Court decisions provide no protection. This statute is intended to fill that void and provide compensation when your property is diminished in value but not totally taken.
Said by
Mike Crapo
Republican · Idaho

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the differences between constitutional protections and a proposed statute regarding property rights.

Share

More from Mike Crapo

Dec 10, 2025

Tomorrow, this Chamber will have the opportunity to chart a new path forward on healthcare in this country. Senators will be given the choice to extend the Biden COVID bonuses for another 3 years or to support healthcare reforms that will…

govinfo.gov
May 21, 2026

As chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Sen. Crapo is in a position to advance the ASAP Act.

idahocapitalsun.com
May 29, 2026

Renewing the Legacy Restoration Fund will help ensure vital repair work continues in Idaho and across the nation.

risch.senate.gov
Jul 21, 2026

This investment reinforces our nation’s technological leadership while reducing reliance on foreign adversaries for critical energy capabilities.

dailymontanan.com

Other voices in this conversation