I don't believe the $3 billion is a real number.
If GSA is not going to reform, we will reform it through the appropriations process.
GSA is not learning from past lessons, and that is what should have every taxpayer concerned.
The question that should really be asked is couldn't we do without GSA altogether?
This is a perfect example of how things should not be done.
To me, that is not aggressively disposing of a property.
I understand that the $6 billion in stimulus money may not have been prioritized correctly.
Should we cut off their money altogether?
If you can sense my frustration and outrage, it is not partisan.
While I am grateful that the administration acted so expeditiously and I commend FEMA for the manner in which they have reacted to this circ...
Why encourage mitigation in building codes? As a Member from California, I know firsthand the difference building codes can have in saving l...