Will the Court uphold a woman's constitutional right to choose or upend decades of legal precedent to overturn Roe v. Wade?
On the record
U.S. State Attorneys General
Quotes from current and former U.S. state attorneys general.
Current attorneys general
IABrenna BirdIowa36 Quotes
CARob BontaCalifornia159 Quotes
MDAnthony G. BrownMaryland87 Quotes
WANick BrownWashington38 Quotes
MAAndrea Joy CampbellMassachusetts173 Quotes
GAChris CarrGeorgia6 Quotes
VTCharity ClarkVermont15 Quotes
OKGentner DrummondOklahoma37 Quotes
MNKeith EllisonMinnesota298 Quotes
MSLynn FitchMississippi7 Quotes
NVAaron D. FordNevada48 Quotes
ARTim GriffinArkansas68 Quotes
MOCatherine HanawayMissouri19 Quotes
NEMike HilgersNebraska35 Quotes
SDMarty JackleySouth Dakota17 Quotes
NC-DJeff JacksonNorth Carolina50 Quotes
NYLetitia JamesNew York257 Quotes
DEKathy JenningsDelaware2 Quotes
VAJay JonesVirginia45 Quotes
WIJosh KaulWisconsin32 Quotes
KSKris KobachKansas53 Quotes
ID-RRaúl LabradorIdaho37 Quotes
ALSteve MarshallAlabama27 Quotes
AZKris MayesArizona62 Quotes
LALiz MurrillLouisiana40 Quotes
MIDana NesselMichigan115 Quotes
TXKen PaxtonTexas140 Quotes
ILKwame RaoulIllinois11 Quotes
ORDan RayfieldOregon30 Quotes
INTodd RokitaIndiana219 Quotes
DCBrian SchwalbDistrict of Columbia7 Quotes
CTWilliam TongConnecticut46 Quotes
FLJames UthmeierFlorida118 Quotes
COPhil WeiserColorado64 Quotes
SCAlan WilsonSouth Carolina61 Quotes
NDDrew WrigleyNorth Dakota4 Quotes
OHDave YostOhio5 Quotes
Former attorneys general
Will the Court protect the rights of working people and our middle class or side with corporations who want to dismantle organized labor in America?
During our meeting, I was encouraged when you said that the purpose of Article III of the Constitution was to protect the rights of the minority through access to the courts.
Over the past few months, I have heard from thousands of people who are deeply worried about their families, their kids, and the future of our country under the Trump administration.
If President Eisenhower pursued the same policies President Trump would like to, it is very possible I would not be here today.
For me, this hearing is about the people in this country who are getting screwed every single second, minute, and hour of the day.
It is about LGBTQ Americans who want the same rights as everyone else.
It is about women having the choice of what to do with their bodies, our bodies.
It is about Muslim Americans who are victims in a renewed wave of hate crimes asking for protection from the courts.
It is about the working poor who are one paycheck away from being on the streets.
This hearing is about more than considering a nominee for the Supreme Court. It is about the future of our country.
As I observed to Secretary Perry during his nomination hearing, DOE has been a key supporter of Hawaii's efforts to transition from importing oil to renewable energy.
What I am getting at, are there any statutory prohibitions that result in subsequent or sequential review as opposed to people just not being on the same page at these various agencies?
So if I were to go to Kaneohe Marine Corps, for example, would there be a session that I could attend where this situation would be discussed?
I would say another aspect of all of this is that what kind of message are you giving to the current female marines?
How do you change the culture when, for example, you have a Commander in Chief who exhibits certain attitudes toward women?
I realize that so much of this kind of behavior has to do with some attitudes and culture, and it is very difficult, General Neller, to change the culture.

