I support the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. But I am concerned States cannot meet their matching requirement.
David McKinley
The Public Record
David Bennett McKinley is a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives, serving West Virginia's 1st congressional district from January 5, 2011, until January 3, 2023. A member of the Republican Party, McKinley focused on issues such as energy policy, infrastructure development, and healthcare during his time in office. He was known for advocating for the coal industry and promoting economic growth in West Virginia. McKinley also served on various committees, including the House Energy and Commerce Committee, where he played a role in shaping legislation related to energy and health care.
But there is a difference between investing wisely and saddling our children with crushing debt.
Could we use the funds that we had from COVID for State and local government since it is used for healthcare on this?
How long do you think it would be--what timeframe would be appropriate to make the repairs?
We are losing as much as 30 percent of the water. Thirty percent of the water that we treated.
Thirty percent is not acceptable. Imagine if we lost 30 percent of our oil and gas in the pipelines, if we leaked that.
Look, I get a kick out of, as a civil engineer--the only licensed civil engineer in Congress--I get a kick out of the fact that our committee and others keep referring to the ASCE report.
We have got to stop this. And according to the American Water Works Association, we are going to need 1.7, almost 2 trillion dollars through 2050 to repair this infrastructure.
Can you guarantee me that the Biden plan will lower global emissions to less than 350 parts per million?
Look, to reduce global CO2, the administration has been calling for zero-carbon emissions from American power plants by 2035.
I think it is a good place for bipartisanship. That is what I am thinking, if we work together.
What can we do? What would you suggest? Is that maybe you and I, we put together something, we----
Unfortunately, there are over 1,100 designated Superfund sites around the country.
If the Senate and other House committees are having hybrid in-person hearings who is directing you not to do the same?
Under Obama, his focus was entirely on climate, and the Superfund sites were neglected.





