That seems a get outside of that 20-year window we were talking about.

That is our thought as well, is that maybe there is a need to codify some of these things because it is a possibility that someone may be elected that does not----

So what happens when SECRETARY or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) or some other independent agency is working on a rule and you have other banking rules that are happening simultaneously?

Did you set an actual date like that?

Is the standard then for the review of a rule, if they get a lot of complaints or a lot of praise?

If there is not coordination, how do we get that if they are not included in this conversation with OIRA?

But if the benefits are not for 20 years or for 30 years, I think that is the heart of Senator Enzi's question.

You might want to check on some of the regulations coming down in the coal industry then because that has been a pretty rapid acceleration, some of the call issues and the number of jobs that have been lost on that one.

So you are saying that of all 25 candidates for President out there, you are confident that all 25 of them will continue the same process?

We do not have to do that on a cost-benefit analysis on something that was very significant and it ends up being a very costly rule at the end of the day.

The challenge here is the Department of Interior is managing both juvenile justice and criminal justice in Indian Country, educational issues, health care issues, mineral rights issues, and water issues.

In my State of Oklahoma, the Sac and Fox Nation runs a juvenile program.

There are 566 tribes nationwide, and there are some success stories and some places to be able to replicate these things.

I do not mind paying taxes, I just do not want you to waste my money.

If we could somehow figure out how to do something close to comprehensive immigration reform, we would save hundreds of billions of dollars and our GDP would grow, as well.

One-point-eight million new jobs created and GDP to grow by 1.5 percent a year annually and that is worth doing, and it is also worth paying for, as well.

We absolutely need encrypted technology because we are very exposed.

It does require a legislative fix.

Yes. Right. Yes, that part I understand.

We've got to have some kind of balance in the conversation.

That would be very helpful not only for the State, but for the Nation as well.

This is the latest technological battle we're going to deal with.

Okay. So I'm really talking the step before that then, and that's where you're not talking about now, that social media side of that.

the best thing that we can do is to be able to get our technology up to speed so that we have fewer instances like this

This will be settled somewhere around June 25, there will be a decision up here one morning on the website.