On the recordJuly 15, 2015
But if the benefits are not for 20 years or for 30 years, I think that is the heart of Senator Enzi's question.
Source
congress.govBut if the benefits are not for 20 years or for 30 years, I think that is the heart of Senator Enzi's question.
Lankford emphasizes the importance of understanding the timing of benefits in regulatory analysis.
Share
More from James Lankford
We’re faced with nothing less than a crisis, and we need collective action.
Chairman, really, this is a question for you. And it’s a question to try to figure out how do we get a good answer on this.
When appropriations is done, then you can go home or move to other subjects."
Making the government more efficient isn't a partisan issue, it's an American issue.