On the recordJuly 15, 2015
We do not have to do that on a cost-benefit analysis on something that was very significant and it ends up being a very costly rule at the end of the day.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Lankford questions the necessity of cost-benefit analysis for significant rules.
Share & report
More from James Lankford
Jan 22, 2025
Mr. President, for the past 45 minutes or so, my colleagues have come to this floor to be able to talk about a bill that is coming soon that we will actually vote on at the bottom of this hour. It is a bill we have talked about for several…
Dec 20, 2024
Madam President, several years ago, it was a December like this; there were big bills that were coming through the House and the Senate, one of them being the National Defense Authorization Act, which has passed every single year for the…
Sep 12, 2024
Madam President, I ended up being a topic of conversation for the past month and a half or so in a lot of political conversations about immigration and the border. So I want to be able to come to this body and to say the immigration issues…
Mar 4, 2025
DOGE is not a real department. It's an idea. It's an internal conversation within the White House.
Other voices in this conversation
