We do not have to do that on a cost-benefit analysis on something that was very significant and it ends up being a very costly rule at the end of the day.
Editor's note · Context
Lankford questions the necessity of cost-benefit analysis for significant rules.
Share
More from James Lankford
Chaplains serve because they are called to it. Congress has a responsibility to make sure they can carry out that calling faithfully, without being forced to violate the tenets of their faith and without fear of retaliation for holding to…
We need to take government shutdowns off the table and force Congress to stay in town until its work is done.
God creates every child male or female in His perfect image. For too long, taxpayers have been forced to fund sex-rejecting studies on kids.
It costs nearly four cents to make a penny that is worth one cent. That is not a good use of taxpayer dollars. The Common Cents Act is a bipartisan, commonsense solution that will save taxpayers millions of dollars while ensuring…





