If the Army has the capacity, but not the capability (i.e., skills and readiness) and is not resourced to fix that shortfall before deploying the force, we will have reached an unacceptable level of risk to the force.

The priority for U.S. military assistance to Taiwan is to provide defensive systems and capabilities in order for Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capacity.

The men and women of our uniformed force and their families deserve our respect and commitment.

The American People expect the Marine Corps to be nation's force and readiness.

General Dunford, does our military have the capability and credibility to deter aggression around the globe?

General Dunford, do you believe our potential adversaries have that perception?

Readiness is the core requirement, which underpins deterrence of rational opponents.

Is this the correct size for our Army given threats around the world and demands for ground forces everywhere?

Being postured to fight one Major Contingency Operation reduces the military's deterrent effect.

I remain strongly committed to our veterans and their families. When America sends our men and women to war, we vow to care for them when they return. However, throughout the Nation, we have seen reports of our veterans enduring long wait…

My initial assessment is yes. However, if Budget Control Act level cuts return, we will need to reassess our ability to execute the strategy with an acceptable level of risk.

Going to a zero option next year would be playing roulette with Afghanistan's future.