this is very simple. It is not a complicated thing to deal with. It simply says that we take the language that is supported and has been put in by the distinguished Senator from Vermont and add--I will read it one more time, these words-- This subsection shall not apply unless the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the unified combatant commanders certify in writing to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives that the signing of the Convention is consistent with the combat requirements and safety of the armed forces of the United States. So it is a very straightforward and simple amendment. Quite frankly, I want to have the input of the military when these decisions are made.
Jim Inhofe: “this is very simple. It is not a complicated thing to deal with. It simply says that we take the language that is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to military input on the signing of a convention.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
we have peer competitors in cyberspace and some of them have already hinted that they hold the power to cripple our infrastructure and set back our standard of living if they choose.
During Cheryl's time with the Department of Defense, she worked diligently to ensure every general and flag officer recommended for promotion or appointment was thoroughly vetted prior to a nomination being submitted to the Secretary of…
It is imperative that any TSCA modernization efforts be bipartisan, based on sound science, protective of public health, and continue to allow American industry to lead the world through responsible innovation.
There is no state that is more dependent upon the issues that are brought in this Committee hearing, and this is the reason I got on it in the first place.





