would the chairman acknowledge the $160 billion is only for 5 years? If you were to implement this policy over the full 75-year timeframe, the present value would be roughly $1 trillion. My calculation is not down to the last decimal point. But the point being not that $160 billion will save Social Security, nor $1 trillion, but doesn't the Senator think we ought to be making steps, even if it is not this approach, to begin to address these shortfalls as we go forward?
Jon S. Corzine: “would the chairman acknowledge the $160 billion is only for 5 years? If you were to implement this policy over the full…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of Social Security reform.
Share
More from Jon S. Corzine
I support the $1.1 billion Shelby amendment. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Senator Reid has 8 minutes, Senator Byrd has 12 minutes; Senator Sarbanes has 1 minute; Senator Shelby, 15; and Senator Gregg, 34 minutes. The Senator from New Jersey.
I call up amendment No. 1619. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report. The assistant legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from New Jersey [Mr. Corzine] for himself, Mr. Lautenberg, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Clinton…
I also believe we must defend the independence of the judiciary, and I think the comments of both the Senator from Illinois and the Senator from New York regarding this subject are ones that need to be understood and need to be brought…
these letters indicate the bipartisan, bicameral support to protect the current OCS moratoria. Moving in the direction of ending the moratoria will bring unnecessary opposition to the overall objective. Residents of coastal States should…





