The idea that we were not going to have the U.N. involved; now we have the U.N. involved. We were going to have de-Baathification; and then we have reentry of Baaths. The issue of deployment of troops. I am supportive of this Ambassador, but it is high time we get a consistent, thoughtful policy that is vetted with more than a few, narrow interests inside the Pentagon and maybe inside the White House. We need to have a real discussion about the direction of our policies on occupation and transition of political power and sovereignty. It is too costly. In the context of this series of events that all Americans are repulsed by, we need to stand back and say it is time to be thoughtful and fully vet the kinds of policies we are going to put in place because this is a long-term project.
Jon S. Corzine: “The idea that we were not going to have the U.N. involved; now we have the U.N. involved. We were going to have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. policy on Iraq and the involvement of the U.N. during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Jon S. Corzine
I would not be worth a darn without what they have been able to do. I want to say that the staff who works the floor has been remarkable. Without Lula Davis' help and people such as Marty and other folks who guide us through how we get…
Anytime the Federal Government is competing for money in the capital markets, instead of us having that money go into the private sector, instead of being invested in the kinds of growth you see in Nevada or what we hope will happen in New…
I wish to say that I have nothing but the highest respect for the Senator from Virginia, and I fully appreciate that he is acting absolutely in good faith. I would like to hear what the unanimous consent is we are agreeing to so that once…
Certainly. Mr. McCONNELL. Would the Senator from New Jersey be willing to withhold until I get a time agreement on one of the Coburn amendments, and then the Senator from New Jersey will be recognized again?





