I offer this amendment to protect the role of Congress and elected State and local officials in determining the nature and scope of significant public services. It is one thing for Congress to sacrifice its own prerogatives in the development of trade policy, as we will likely do today with the passage of trade promotion authority; however, in my view, it goes much too far to delegate constitutional responsibilities of elected officials when it comes to determining what are public services and what significant public services should be managed in the public sector. My amendment stands for the simple proposition that trade agreements should not be used to privatize public services--public services duly directed by constitutionally authorized actors of our Nation's democratic processes.
Jon S. Corzine: “I offer this amendment to protect the role of Congress and elected State and local officials in determining the nature…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendment No. 3461 related to the role of Congress in public services during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Jon S. Corzine
The idea that we were not going to have the U.N. involved; now we have the U.N. involved. We were going to have de-Baathification; and then we have reentry of Baaths. The issue of deployment of troops. I am supportive of this Ambassador…
I point out this year, by decision, the FOP is not taking a position with regard to my amendment.
Anytime the Federal Government is competing for money in the capital markets, instead of us having that money go into the private sector, instead of being invested in the kinds of growth you see in Nevada or what we hope will happen in New…
It is undermining the ability of working Americans to actually get good wages. That is why median income is down. That is why you go from $45,000 for a job lost to picking up a job worth $35,000.





