Frank Pallone

I hope that the Commissioners really listen to the millions of comments that are coming in from around the Nation and reconsider their dangerous plan to eliminate net neutrality.

If the FCC moves ahead with its net neutrality repeal, the consequences will be severe.

A free and open internet is crucial for our democracy by giving everyone an equal voice online, especially those communities too often overlooked by traditional media.

This hearing should have occurred months ago. The Republican majority had no problem conducting oversight of the previous Obama administration holding quarterly oversight hearings.

I think you have tackled one of the issues that is first and foremost in the needs of viewers around the country.

I am a strong believer in the need for greater viewpoint diversity across our public airwaves.

I remain committed to delivering just and reasonable rates for the 2.7 million children who have been hampered in their quest to communicate with an incarcerated parent.

I am thankful for the leadership of Congressman Bobby Rush and others on this subcommittee who, for years, have fought for real reform.

Without Title II, it will be far more difficult for the Commission to enact policies to promote competition.

Net neutrality is crucial for our democracy by giving everyone an equal voice online-especially those communities too often overlooked by traditional media.

Too often, when given the choice, this FCC has sided with large corporations to the detriment of hardworking Americans.

I am deeply concerned that the FCC is on a wrong path, a path that will hurt small businesses, regular people, and some of the most innovative sectors of our economy.

The Commission reinstated the UHF discount for what seems to be no other reason than to enable an unprecedented merger between Sinclair and Tribune.

If the FCC moves ahead with its net neutrality plan the consequences will be severe.

I support H.R. 3163, and I am glad that we have been able to work on a bipartisan basis on this important bill to ensure continued patient access to these important drugs at home.

It is our job as legislators to continue this work to ensure that the program remains strong for future generations.

I am opposed to IPAB and would be in favor of abolishing it.

It is long past overdue for us to have a serious discussion about a permanent policy to address these caps.

When it comes to stroke, every second counts. Stroke telemedicine, also known as telestroke, breaks down barriers to care, and is a valuable tool for combating our Nation's fifth leading cause of death.

Medicare plays a critical role in the lives of our Nation's seniors and disabled Americans, and it is so important that this committee continue to look for ways to strengthen the program and deliver the highest quality care to…

It is critical that our committee, at a minimum, take the time we need to examine these matters so that we arrive at decisions that are informed by fact and that serve the interests of our districts, our states, and the nation as a whole.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thanks for holding the hearing to provide us with a market participant perspective in our system of electricity regulation.

The 340B program does play a valuable role in our efforts to provide a robust safety net for vulnerable patients

As a result, they are able to reach more eligible patients and provide those patients with more comprehensive health services, and I believe in both protecting 340B and improving the integrity of the program to ensure it remains strong for…

The 340B program is a critical component of the safety net that serves the most vulnerable among us and 340B drug discounts help safety net providers make the most of the limited resources they receive.