Frank Pallone
The Public Record
Frank Joseph Pallone is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 6th congressional district since 1993. A member of the Democratic Party, Pallone has been a prominent advocate for health care reform, environmental protection, and consumer rights. He has played a key role in shaping legislation related to public health and climate change, often speaking out against policies he views as detrimental to these areas.
I strongly support H.R. 3394, introduced by Representative McMorris Rodgers.
If there is one thing we have learned in the past two weeks -a period that has left nearly 8 million without power-it is that climate change is having devastating effects on our communities.
I firmly believe that it is time to start looking at reliability in new and different ways.
Last week I was outraged when President Trump announced that he would be ending the DACA program. DACA recipients are contributing members of our society, have no criminal record, and have known only this country as home. They work at…
I think part of the problem is that, you know, you are not allowed to initiate that.
I want to thank my colleagues, Congressman Latta, Green, Burgess, Guthrie, and DeGette, for working with me on this draft legislation.
I look forward to continuing our work together to reach consensus on this important issue.
The FAST Act would expand coverage of telestroke services so that beneficiaries can get the right treatment at the right time.
I want to thank you also for holding today's hearing on the over-the-counter drug monograph reform and establishment of over-the-counter monograph user fee program.
Medicare plays a critical role in the lives of our Nation's seniors and Americans with disabilities.
This so-called 'relief' from regulation comes at the expense of the people's health.
These bills make that trade, and they undermine the public health protections within the Clean Air Act.
I oppose it in its current form. This may be something we can work on going forward, but I can't support a bill that facilitates emissions cheating.
We all want small businesses to thrive, and the history of the Clean Air Act demonstrates clearly that we can grow the economy while cleaning up the air and improving public health.
The so-called relief from regulation comes at the expense of the public's health, and costs are not reduced.
Exempting businesses from clean air rules leads to more air pollution. It is that simple.
I thank my good friend Bill Johnson for taking the lead on this bipartisan effort.
The BRICK Act is the wrong answer. It would set a terrible precedent, encouraging endless legal challenges designed to stall compliance with regulations.
Ultimately, delaying or undermining rules that seek to reduce hazardous air pollutants is not good for Americans.
Ultimately, I do not believe we should be giving any fuel source special treatment on reducing air pollution, especially when other power plants are expected to meet similar requirements.
The Viewer Protection Act will make sure that broadcasters can continue to serve us when we need them most.





