I opposed the School-to-Work Opportunities Act when it was considered by the Senate because it will create yet another job training program at a time when we should be reforming the 154 job training programs we already have. I will vote against the conference report on this bill for the same reason. Having said that, I do want to acknowledge particularly the efforts of Senator Kennedy, Senator Thurmond, Senator Simon, and their staffs in working on the conference bill. I appreciate the courtesy and cooperation of everyone involved. When this bill was debated in the Senate, supporters stated repeatedly that it did not create a new program. Instead, they contended the legislation would encourage coordination of existing programs under the school-to-work umbrella. I share the goal of creating a better integrated system to improve the transition from school to work, and I wish this bill did that. But it doesn't. The bill creates yet another stand-alone job training program, with a separate authorization, a separate pool of funds, and a separate string of eligibility requirements. Despite my objections to this legislation, I do appreciate the efforts of the conferees to retain provisions which I believe do offer more flexibility to States and localities to integrate existing programs. For example, there is not longer a mandatory requirement that all programs must provide paid work opportunities to all students.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the School-to-Work Opportunities Act during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Nancy Kassebaum
while we may differ on the support ultimately of this legislation, I, too, wish to commend the Senator from Minnesota for his very constructive approach on the school-to-work legislation. As Senator Durenberger outlined, he talked to many…
It would not jeopardize safety at all. The aviation industry and general aviation is guided each step of the way from the beginning design to the completion of the plane by Federal safety guidelines. There are various steps of…
Tomorrow our Nation mourns the death of President Nixon, our 37th President. I do not know what history's judgment will be on Richard Nixon. He was a man whose personal flaws became the flaws of a deeply troubled Presidency. But his great…
I agree with the Senator from New Hampshire on that. It is not language I necessarily think is necessary. It is not mandatory language, as you know. It is only there as a voluntary guideline. I share the Senator's concern because I think…





