I agree with the Senator from New Hampshire on that. It is not language I necessarily think is necessary. It is not mandatory language, as you know. It is only there as a voluntary guideline. I share the Senator's concern because I think from that it could lead to other consequences if, indeed, it ever became mandatory.
Nancy Kassebaum: “I agree with the Senator from New Hampshire on that. It is not language I necessarily think is necessary. It is not…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the necessity and implications of certain language in legislation.
Share
More from Nancy Kassebaum
Without the dedicated efforts of our staff, it would not have been possible. I mention Dean Rosen, Susan Hattan of my staff, and David Nexon and Lauren Ewers of Senator Kennedy's staff, and many others who have spent countless time and…
If I may respond briefly to my good friend and colleague and member of the Labor Committee as well, some clarification on the Harris Trust. I have spoken earlier to it and I will not reiterate. I certainly agree, ERISA is complicated. It…
I would also note that S. 1044 continues an authority in current law that permits the Secretary to designate a population as "medically underserved" if the chief executive officer of a State and local officials recommend that designation…
when I assumed the chairmanship of the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee last year, one of my top priorities was to bring to fruition a comprehensive reform of our many job training programs. My colleague in that effort on the…





