Barry Loudermilk

I asked him: Do you support that? Do you support the idea that 80 percent of Americans think there should be security in the elections and that you have to prove who are you and that you are eligible to vote?

The idea that voter ID somehow keeps people from voting is just not true.

Centralizing is a security risk.

Surveil the markets. So, you are looking to use this as a surveillance tool of the markets to enforce regulation, or what is the purpose of the Consolidated Audit Trail?

Tracking unsuspected and unsuspecting Americans' every move in hopes of finding unlawful activity is not consistent with the principles undergirding the Constitution.

I believe it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment of right to privacy of individual investors.

The United States has only 4.4 percent of the world's population, but 50 percent of the capital is raised here.

Security is extremely important, especially during this tenuous time that we live in.

I agree with Mr. Morelle that we have more unanswered questions at this point.

These actions very well could equate to voter suppression simply by losing the faith and confidence of the American people in their electoral system.

I think it was important to have this hearing, and I think it is important that we continue the oversight and investigations that we are empowered to do.

Without objection, it is submitted.

It is the Election Bureau that is responsible?

To me, that is a form of voter suppression, when you make people think that their vote is not going to count.

I have had several voters tell me, 'I want to make sure that my vote counts before I go to the poll.'

We need to go back to funding the RISS network so that we have the ability to move information from State and locals to our Federal partners, and our Federal partners back to State and local agencies.

Law enforcement agencies in towns and counties across the country, including in my own Georgia's 11th Congressional District, are on the front lines of the war against the cartels and those that are financially supporting them.

I look forward to working together to bring robust oversight to the legislative branch.

If you want the water glass to stand up on the stool, you have to fund all three legs--prevention, enforcement, and rehabilitation--at the same levels, and quit taking the money back when we make strides forward.

The CFPB has a long track record of dodging or outright defying statutory limits on its authorities.

The issue here is defining who is the king. Kings have ultimate authority without any constraint, without any oversight.

I want to talk about the security of the Capitol itself.

If you don't need something, don't keep it, because you don't have to protect what you don't have.

I believe the Bank Secrecy Act needs to be revised because we are dealing with reporting thresholds that were developed in the 1970s at $10,000, to where it should be around $65,000 to $70,000 today.

If we are not using the data, why are we collecting it? Why are we keeping it?