This is a much about political expediency as it is anything else, and that should never be in Articles of Impeachment.

The obstruction has only occurred from Adam Schiff and the HPSCI and the majority keeping people from actually trying to find the truth.

What we are debating here, in my opinion, is the weakest case in history, and yet, the Democrats have decided to go full speed ahead...

I never thought we would cross outside of the ocean to try and basically impugn the integrity of a world leader like we have been for the last two hearings.

The problem that we are seeing here is when you even get to the articles themselves, abuse of power, when you look at these articles and compare them to history.

The Framers didn't want that. We had an independent presidency.

I don't know about you, but I am not a rubber stamp, and I don't like what I have been forced to do.

When they can't make their argument that the President pressured Mr. Zelensky, they then attack Mr. Zelensky, and then say that he was pressured when Mr. Zelensky, on numerous occasions, has said, I have not been pressured.

We had a bunch of law professors, three of which who cannot stand the President, who cannot stand his voters, and cannot stand the fact that he is still in office, telling us why he should be impeached.

This is the year you put a dagger in minority rights.

We have called this impeachment a sham because we just simply don't have a better way to describe it.