I want to note that one of those points says promoting homosexuality to school children. And then down below in the real fine print, which no one can read from here, the Christian Coalition is described as a pro-family action organization, I believe is the phrase. In context, I believe a reasonable person could conclude that a pro-family action organization does not think it is a good idea to promote homosexuality to schoolchildren and, therefore, that would fall under Shays-Meehan as being held to be applicable to their law and, therefore, would be banned. I would like the gentleman from California (Mr. Campbell) to explain to me his interpretation.
John Doolittle: “I want to note that one of those points says promoting homosexuality to school children. And then down below in the real…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a law related to promoting homosexuality in schools.
Share
More from John Doolittle
And yet they talk about it all the time and blame us for being antihealth care and antieducation. And yet all the innovations that have occurred in the last dozen years have occurred under Republican leadership.
The underlying bill makes numerous references to public infrastructure. We feel this, indeed, is public infrastructure, and that it deals with roads and schools. There are certainly needy counties by virtue of being included in this Secure…
Actually, I want to ask you one too, so I'm glad you're both up here. Mr. Chairman, you have worked with us and tried to help us, and I would agree with Mr. Walden on that. You were kind enough to offer something a minute ago that I'd just…
You would have to be entitled to have a Social Security number, which, as I understand it, would be someone who is employed here.





