There is an Ambassador who has been murdered. We have three other people who have been murdered. It is a terrorist attack.
Dana Rohrabacher
The Public Record
Dana Rohrabacher is a former U.S. Representative for California's 48th congressional district, serving from 1989 to 2019. A member of the Republican Party, he is known for his libertarian views and strong support for the tech industry. During his time in Congress, Rohrabacher was an advocate for various issues, including technology innovation and foreign policy matters, particularly regarding Taiwan and its democratic governance. He often emphasized the importance of individual liberties and limited government intervention.
Terrorism and terrorism threats to the United States is a security issue, and if the CIA and these other people are giving it over to our law enforcement, FBI, it is a mistaken decision from the top.
This is absolutely absurd, and I don't think that that is lost on the American people.
What we are talking about here is a terrorist attack which is not a criminal matter, which is a matter of national security.
Why is it the CIA, and why aren't they the ones doing this investigation? Why is it the FBI?
For not dispatching help, that is a dereliction of some type of responsibility.
No one knew how long this attack was going to exist and go on, how long would this attack last.
Let us hope that this hearing is a step forward in our effort to break down what I consider to be a wall of deceit and denial and an attempt to hide the truth from the American people about this Benghazi attack.
I think if you really dig down, you are going to find out that countries like Vietnam, governments like Vietnam, actually have constitutions.
Vietnam is an out-and-out dictatorship. It is the dictatorship of the proletariat.
When the United States retreats from engagement from around the world I think chaos follows.
The administration floating the idea of a zero troop option in Afghanistan after 2014, that does nothing but embolden our enemy.
It is not anti-Russian to do that, but it is pro-human being to try to develop more availability of resources.
Competition is good for people's standard of living, and as we have found out in the United States.
It is a good idea to have several sources for gas and several sources for the vital minerals and materials.
The challenge has to do with political decisions and political stability and within Afghanistan and that region.
So let us note that you are saying it is a challenging project, but it is not challenging engineering-wise, is it?
I have and will continue to advocate for the importance of increasing democratic governance and rule of law in that region.
I think that this should be viewed, and the subject should be viewed in terms of national security, but also in terms of in humanitarian terms as well.
Perhaps this would be a good time to try to demand some positive ties based on economic dual interest.
Let us hope that there will be some stability enough so that those natural resources and that is what this is all about, will be able to be utilized to help human beings.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), add the following: Sec. _. None of the funds made…





