Mr. Chairman, I think it's only fair to point out that there is so much that the industry can work with...

The Agency has a responsibility that you do not have the mentality of crucifying people that may not be too guilty, but you've got to make your point.

I'm concerned that there might be a mindset of let's crucify one guy on the front gate, and anybody who would try to buy these bogus things purposely will be scared to death.

But that is like saying that the people that are a victim of counterfeit isn't going to be prosecuted as counterfeiters when the fact is they're losing value down the line.

There are changes need to be made, and reform is not a bad word in a lot of episodes.

Mr. Bunker, I think you and everybody else that's required to enforce either a law or regulation understands that when the Legislature passes a law, there's always the assumption of discretionary enforcement.

I think here we need to learn from our successes and our failures.

The little guy who gets squeezed out by mistakes by big government.

No, I think Ms. Case would be the first one to say if you pick one company, you're going to be the--you're going to be left out, and some big guy is going to be in line for all the business.

From the consumer's point of view, the purchaser, right now when it comes to illegal employment, we put the burden on the employer to check with an old I-9 system that has been so fraudulent that everybody knows it's just a scam for…

Government obstructionism is a major challenge to innovative technology.

I would say this, and I will say this to both sides of the aisle and the leadership here.