I certainly don't want to stall growth in this Nation. I mean, gosh, we are the greatest Nation on earth.
Mike Johanns
The Public Record
Mike Johanns is a former United States Senator from Nebraska, serving from 2009 to 2015. A member of the Republican Party, he previously held the position of Secretary of Agriculture under President George W. Bush from 2005 to 2007. Johanns has a background in law and public service, having served as the Governor of Nebraska from 1999 to 2005. His tenure in the Senate included work on agricultural policy and issues related to rural development. Johanns is known for his commitment to supporting farmers and ranchers during his time in office.
Do we have in our system the cord we can pull that is the safety valve that says, again, in effect, time out.
You did it in a very bipartisan way. You worked with Republicans, Democrats, and Independents.
Well, let me start out and thank the Chairman for holding this hearing, a very, very important topic.
But if the only option is for these people who are in default or have missed payments, if the only option is bankruptcy, they will probably take that option.
I hear what you are trying to say, and I think you are trying to assure me that, Mike, it isn't going to be that bad.
I suspect in his State they have identical problems as we do: just a lack of services in the rural areas.
I have very high hopes for this pilot program, because there is, in some cases at least, capacity in some rural areas.
And one of the things President Washington warned the very young Nation about was debt and the calamity that that can create for a nation.
I will be very honest, I am not sure why people bother with it. Because it has to be so impossibly cumbersome.
The system isn't working. We really do have, in many cases, 20, 30 or longer years in which tribes file petitions and never quite get an answer.
I think you are the right person for the job, and I will wrap up by saying, you do have some challenges.
If we don't deal with this, it is hard for me to imagine these other issues that we are concerned about work very well.
I don't want the Congress or this Committee to be the arbiter of who should be recognized and who shouldn't be recognized.
I think listening is always a very good thing, and they will be very excited to have you there listening.





