You know, the idea is to create these opportunities for communities to resolve and deal with some of these incredible challenges in very remote areas in a State that doesn't have traditional Indian Country.
Mark Begich
The Public Record
Mark Begich is an American politician who served as the U.S. Senator from Alaska from 2009 to 2014. A member of the Democratic Party, he focused on issues such as healthcare, veterans' affairs, and economic development during his time in office. Begich was known for his efforts to advocate for Alaska's unique needs and challenges, including those related to energy and the environment.
This bill will give communities the tools they have been asking for to bring stability and justice to their homes and villages.
The bill, which is broadly supported by the Alaska Native community in my State, provides some of America's remote communities more tools to deal with their enormous challenges.
We would like to thank Senator Begich for introducing this bill, which has the potential of substantially improving the safety of villages throughout Alaska.
I hear from Alaska's Tribal leaders every day about the need for more resources to address suicide, substance abuse, and domestic violence.
I think it's in Alaska's interest, and most rural states' interests, to make sure that there's a fiscal efficiency in the program.
The beauty of the technology revolution is that it's built new tools and put them in our toolbox to solve hard problems.
1 percent of the country is not served by wireless--almost 15 percent of Alaska.
I always like to--on my business card, instead of putting Alaska by Baja or down by Mexico, I put it where it's in proportion to the rest of the country.
I will do whatever I can to assist in ensuring that as time goes on that all the fisheries, no matter what the stocks are, are sustainable.
We have to look at why that is, what can we do to improve that so it's not just an arbitrary number that some have mentioned here.
The danger of acidification to spawning grounds, to crustaceans is gigantic, and it's already having an impact.
The levels of heavy metals that are showing up in our fish is really alarming.
We all understand our obligations to check the fishery, but we also just want to make sure we're basing choices on good science, good judgment, good input, good common sense.
I am a believer, just so Mr. Welch understands this--we have had success around these quotas, around catch shares--hard numbers too.
It seems like there is agency support--which for NOAA to support something of this nature indicates they feel very confident of the science.
When you do a one to three-year spread-- when you do assessments every three years, your odds are you're going to take a much more conservative approach because you don't have enough assessments every year.
And, I guess, the last quick question on personnel issues--I understand as a former mayor how you have to manage that very carefully.
If you--in your comments again, under Challenges Remaining, you mention in the fiscal 2012 budget this is one of the challenges.
Could you put together a schematic that shows me the tools you're using to communicate, how often you're communicating?





