Absolutely, I say to the Senator from Delaware. In Alaska, I chaired the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the MPO, which had this money that would come from this legislation. It would come to us, and if they delayed it here or they had…
Mark Begich
The Public Record
Mark Begich is an American politician who served as the U.S. Senator from Alaska from 2009 to 2014. A member of the Democratic Party, he focused on issues such as healthcare, veterans' affairs, and economic development during his time in office. Begich was known for his efforts to advocate for Alaska's unique needs and challenges, including those related to energy and the environment.
The Senator was a county executive; I was a mayor of a community. We had to deal with the real-life aftermath of what happens around here, especially when it comes to these extensions. I know in my city, when I saw these extensions from…
I've long been an advocate for eliminating assignment restrictions for women in the military.
I may better understand it, as it will have a tremendous impact on all men and women in uniform, but especially on constituents in Alaska, as we don't want to go backwards with progress that has been made in the State.
I come from being a former mayor where if I have a CFO, they know all, and at the end of the day, they have to sign off on money things.
So you accept because they go through this kind of chain, to a certain extent, I am not saying all the time.
I will not belabor it more than that, to say the response was not as thoughtful as I thought it would be.
So why not just cut through it all and create a Medicaid waiver program for military that will actually go into play anyway?
I appreciate that answer. But I would have expected that from our personnel department in the city would have done that.
Dr. Woodson, I understand you made a decision recently on the TRICARE contract in the West Region, which serves my home State of Alaska.
Because the evidence is telling you something, and it is worthwhile to ask the question for policyholders to consider, correct?
This year DOD's proposal for TRICARE Prime enrollment fees is for a first-year increase of 30 percent to 78 percent.
I see this as a back door base realignment and closure without all the public process and the need.
Also from the Air Force end, the alternative fuel development, all your technologies now making sure that you are not just on a certain type of aviation fuel, but new technologies so you can become more self-sufficient and less dependent…
The reality is you cannot cut your way out of this problem, there is no possible way.
In an efficient and ready way too. You move quicker with less of those batteries, for example.
I appreciate the Army's initial attempt to utilize voluntary measures to implement the reductions.
We have to deal with revenues. No one wants to talk about it. It scares everyone to death here.
We should have made the decision last year and honestly talked about all three pieces, but we did not.
Would you agree Alaska and Hawaii--two States strategically located to enable the basing, staging, and training of forces to promote U.S. interests in the Asia-Pacific region--are critical and significant to the new guidance?
I think we are game to find those savings. But let us make sure they are sustainable savings, and that is how we look at this.





