Judges & Justices

The Due Process Clause protects an individual's natural liberty from government interference.

There is every reason to think that the ultimate claim of actual innocence on which Gutierrez's case rests is baseless.

The Fourteenth Amendment does not protect Gutierrez's asserted 'liberty interest.'

Intervention serves no purpose other than to exacerbate the already egregious delays endemic to capital litigation.

The statute advances the state’s important interest in shielding children from sexually explicit content.

Will strip those South Carolinians — and countless other Medicaid recipients around the country — of a deeply personal freedom: the ability to decide who treats us at our most vulnerable.

The board's introduction of the 'LGBTQ+ inclusive' storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt-outs, places an unconstitutional burden on the parents' rights to the free exercise of their religion.

The practice of educating one’s children in one’s religious beliefs, like all religious acts and practices, receives a generous measure of protection from our Constitution.

It is turning over information about yourself and your viewing habits—respecting speech many find repulsive—to a website operator, and then to… who knows?

You relax strict scrutiny in one place, and all of a sudden, strict scrutiny gets relaxed in other places.

No one doubts that the distribution of sexually explicit speech to children, of the sort involved here, can cause great harm.

We reject this chilling vision of the power of the state to strip away the critical right of parents to guide the religious development of their children.

Today, we hold that the parents have shown that they are entitled to a preliminary injunction.

I have no doubt that, if judges must allow the executive to act unlawfully in some circumstances, executive lawlessness will flourish.

I have no doubt that, if judges must allow the Executive to act unlawfully in some circumstances, as the Court concludes today, executive lawlessness will flourish, and from there, it is not difficult to predict how this all ends.

The Court’s decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution.

The go-ahead to sometimes wield the kind of unchecked, arbitrary power the Founders crafted our Constitution to eradicate

An existential threat to the rule of law.

Eventually, executive power will become completely uncontainable, and our beloved constitutional Republic will be no more.

Creation of a zone of lawlessness

The uncertainty that would befall hospitals and states in the interim.

The absence of a nationwide injunction would require every individual affected by the executive order to file their own lawsuit, turning the government’s immigration enforcement into a 'catch-me-if-you-can kind of regime.'

An untold number of people currently entitled to U.S. citizenship would be without lawful status to remain in the country.

Our country will now consist of zone one, where individuals born in the country are granted birthright citizenship, and zone two, where they are non-citizens subject to deportation.