Clarence Thomas: “This provision sweeps too broadly, interferes with the party-candidate relationship, and has not been proved necessary…”

For over three decades, I have called for 'a systematic reassessment of our interpretation of §2.'

If they can prove you wrong, fine. But if they call you names or say you’re not black, I mean, how stupid is that? Look at me.

Congress requires this Court to exercise jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to congressional redistricting, and we accordingly have an obligation to resolve such challenges promptly.

‘What if they had certain books marked that were off limits to me?’ That would be wrong.