Given the fact-based nature of the issue in this case and the many serious harms that result from allowing the President to dramatically reconfigure the Federal Government, it was eminently reasonable for the District Court to maintain the status quo while the courts evaluate the lawfulness of the President's executive action.
Jackson's dissent on the Supreme Court's ruling regarding federal layoffs by the Trump administration.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
Hawaii chose to protect the unaware property owner while leaving open to gun owners the opportunity to carry firearms where consent has been provided.
The Court’s decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law.
I think that means it's incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence.