But determining the nationally uniform interim legal status for several years of, say, the Clean Power Plan or Title IX regulations or mifepristone rules is a role that the American people appropriately expect this court — and not only the courts of appeals or district courts — to fulfill
Kavanaugh argues that the Supreme Court should ensure uniformity in legal statuses of significant regulations.
Share
More from Brett Kavanaugh
Not the district courts or courts of appeals, will often still be the ultimate decisionmaker as to the interim legal status of major new federal statutes and executive actions
Because neither Texas nor Fasken successfully intervened, they may not obtain judicial review of the commission's licensing decision under the Hobbs Act.
What is the status of the new regulation or executive order for the next two years?
I think there are different views among members of the court about when to do it and when not.