Those plans are not before this Court.
Ketanji Brown Jackson: “Those plans are not before this Court.”
Editor's note · Context
Justice Jackson emphasized that specific agency plans were not being considered by the Court.
Share
More from Ketanji Brown Jackson
Taking its eye off the ball, the majority misses the Government’s actual objective: to secure our imprimatur for its effort to foment chaos ahead of the November elections.
Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States, when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the court’s attention?
The Court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful.
This ruling violates well-established precedents concerning this Court’s equitable discretion and needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.