On the record
U.S. State Attorneys General
Quotes from current and former U.S. state attorneys general.
Current attorneys general
IABrenna BirdIowa36 Quotes
CARob BontaCalifornia159 Quotes
MDAnthony G. BrownMaryland87 Quotes
WANick BrownWashington38 Quotes
MAAndrea Joy CampbellMassachusetts173 Quotes
GAChris CarrGeorgia6 Quotes
VTCharity ClarkVermont15 Quotes
OKGentner DrummondOklahoma37 Quotes
MNKeith EllisonMinnesota298 Quotes
MSLynn FitchMississippi7 Quotes
NVAaron D. FordNevada48 Quotes
ARTim GriffinArkansas68 Quotes
MOCatherine HanawayMissouri19 Quotes
NEMike HilgersNebraska35 Quotes
SDMarty JackleySouth Dakota17 Quotes
NC-DJeff JacksonNorth Carolina50 Quotes
NYLetitia JamesNew York257 Quotes
DEKathy JenningsDelaware2 Quotes
VAJay JonesVirginia45 Quotes
WIJosh KaulWisconsin32 Quotes
KSKris KobachKansas53 Quotes
ID-RRaúl LabradorIdaho37 Quotes
ALSteve MarshallAlabama27 Quotes
AZKris MayesArizona62 Quotes
LALiz MurrillLouisiana40 Quotes
MIDana NesselMichigan115 Quotes
TXKen PaxtonTexas140 Quotes
ILKwame RaoulIllinois11 Quotes
ORDan RayfieldOregon30 Quotes
INTodd RokitaIndiana219 Quotes
DCBrian SchwalbDistrict of Columbia7 Quotes
CTWilliam TongConnecticut46 Quotes
FLJames UthmeierFlorida118 Quotes
COPhil WeiserColorado64 Quotes
SCAlan WilsonSouth Carolina61 Quotes
NDDrew WrigleyNorth Dakota4 Quotes
OHDave YostOhio5 Quotes
Former attorneys general
That is why I gave you guys a back door to walk out of. You weren't decision makers, but somebody was.
Are we really willing to stand up and protect the individual freedoms and liberties of the American people when the die is cast?
To say that we had no warning when clearly there were requests for increased security... represents absolute failure on someone's part.
The problem is that each one comes with a waiver. And the problem with waivers is that invariably they are exercised, and it is that that needs to be stopped.
At what point do we wake up and say, you know what, we are cutting off your allowance.
I have never been able to buy off people who have evil intents by just giving them money. It kind of emboldens them.
I don't think history plays out that way. In fact, I think it is attributed to Einstein that the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different result.
It's worse -- this alternative going past the deadline is worse than -- may be worse than what will happen to Americans with disabilities and our older Americans if I don't stand firm and fight for them at this time.
I will not sacrifice the interests of seniors and low-income, poor Americans with disabilities just to come up with some deal.
We're not going to stand back and let seniors, people with disabilities, most low-income vulnerable people in this country, bear the brunt of this fiscal entanglement.
It is the excessive and overly burdensome regulation that we are concerned with.
The idea that people on this side of the aisle are anti-regulations per se is just nonsense.
I want them to have clean air, and I want them to have clean water.
The DI shortfall, by the way, is not a surprise.
How do we make the Social Security Administration, working with this Disability Insurance Program, be as effective as possible partnering with the business community
We have to remember that this is a population that has a disability severe enough that in many cases, as I think Miss Ford mentioned, many of them die within a few years of applying for the benefit.
It is not easy to qualify for Social Security disability benefits.
Severely disabled American workers have earned the right to receive disability benefits and they rely on them.
I know it seems like it is somewhat rare to get a chance to come together on a bipartisan basis to do something good for the American people.
Well, that is probably one of the most important things that can come out of this hearing, is an assurance that, one way or the other, as we move forward on this transition, that no American is going to be left behind.
But our number-one goal should be to make sure that every single American receives the Social Security benefits that he or she earned on time and in full.
Isn't it the fact that if there is some legitimate government interest to somehow take a different tack on defining what a religious organization is, doesn't the First Amendment still trump all that?

