Well, I can elucidate this: $5 million over 5 years, as opposed to $8.6 million over 4 years, and without actually now proposing a rule.
Do you consider $8.6 million to be excessive, particularly considering the rule has yet to even be proposed?
All they hear about is the bleating from the environment groups, like, 'Oh, we are going to lose all these species,' except they are not hea...
I support the Endangered Species Act.
It took acts of Congress to accomplish delisting of wolves, and they were listed under the non-essential experimental population component o...
I could relate, as Mr. Southerland said, to the reference that there are spiritual and moral reasons to be good stewards and good caretakers...
I want to thank the Members, particularly the panelists, for your extraordinary participation, for your expertise, and for your thoughtful c...
I might note that on my very own ranch the swift fox was captured for reintroduction elsewhere with our full cooperation.
I would assert that we have moved beyond 1973 in terms of our ability to save species.
But the problem is we are still administering it and enforcing this law by a 20th century litigation model.
USGS should have the funding needed for 3DEP in their budget.