Let me close by saying that I know many of my colleagues across the aisle are skeptical about whether humans contribute to climate change.
We are going to see more of that if we don't allow ourselves to plan for the future with all the tools in the toolbox.
I was in Israel just last week, and a big water project, Red Sea-Dead Sea, is being contemplated to provide water to Jordan.
I have never thought about water as being a commodity. I think about water as being an absolute necessity.
If additional storage had been in place, would some of the water that was turned out, would it have been available for capture, increasing s...
God help us if we are not smart enough to seize the moment. And that moment is the water, as the underlying blood of all of us.
Water transcends partisan politics, it transcends regions, it transcends the kinds of issues that divide us here in Congress.
water is essential to life.
Well, I can elucidate this: $5 million over 5 years, as opposed to $8.6 million over 4 years, and without actually now proposing a rule.
Why is there an entire section of the IG's report on issues within the new contract?
Do you consider $8.6 million to be excessive, particularly considering the rule has yet to even be proposed?